As a veteran, Memorial Day means a lot of gratitude to many people whom I’ve never seen and don’t know.
In towns and cities across the nation, veteran memorials commemorate all those who have fallen. When I read the names etched into these memorials, I try to imagine what their lives were like. Chances are, they were short. But usually I don’t think about them going to war and dying, just about what they were missing back home.
While serving in the military, I found myself missing the small things from home. Like the 4th of July — potato salad, the smell of the grill, and the kids laughing.
So this Memorial Day, I invite people to remember all the men and women who died in the military. They all signed up to serve our country. And they gave up those small moments we enjoy every day.
As a direct result of our partnership with Zimride, carpoolers have saved more than a million driving miles to Esurance-sponsored events like the Sasquatch! Music Festival. We’ve also teamed up to make it easier for Esurance associates to carpool their commutes. If you’re wondering why a car insurance company would care so much about carpooling, we’re here to explain.
Here are the top 3 reasons why Esurance loves a good carpool:
1. Fewer cars, fewer crashes
This is a primary motivation for all insurance providers to rally behind the carpooling cause.
When we each take our own cars to work, we contribute to traffic jams and slightly increase our risk for a collision or mechanical breakdown. Congestion is a leading cause of accidents, and can have a maddening domino effect. All it takes is a single car hitting a guardrail during rush hour. Traffic thickens and becomes more dangerous as the car is cleared and our natural rubbernecking tendency kicks in. Prime time for fender benders.
Congestion also leads to road rage, which is another leading cause of avoidable accidents. Some of the most popular and effective carpools take place during commuting hours, and there’s no better time to take a car off the road.
We have a dream of a rush hour filled with happily chatting passengers and relaxed drivers, and Zimride’s working to turn that goal into rush-hour reality. The bottom line for Esurance as an insurance company, though, is this: Fewer cars on the road makes for safer driving. And fewer accidents lead to fewer claims — and better car insurance rates.
2. It’s green
And Esurance is reaaaaaaaaaaaaally big on green. This eco-emphasis sprouted during our dot-com roots, when we helped turn a traditionally paper-hungry industry into an electronic one. In the decade-plus since, our interest in saving trees has blossomed into numerous green partnerships and tree plantings across the country.
And encouraging our customers and associates to carpool is another way we’re able to help green the planet. Consider the eco-benefits of carpooling: If you carpool 30 miles a day with 3 other people, the shared car (let’s say it gets 25 mpg) emits 3.122 tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. That might sound like a lot, but by leaving Cliff’s Chrysler, Joe’s (classic) Scout, and Diane’s Prowler at home, the 4 of you end up saving 9.366 tons of CO2 a year.
That’s a full-grown elephant’s worth of greenhouse gas saved by a few friendly commuters.
3. It’s community
Esurance sponsors and supports community events from Tampa to Tacoma, and what better way to get to them? To make it easier for everyone to find a ride, we work with Zimride to create event-specific pages for all of our sponsored events.
Last year was a banner year for Esurance ridesharing. People who signed up to share rides to sponsored events saved 1,484,853 driving miles over the course of the year. That’s 6.21 trips to the moon, not to mention an army of greenhouse-gas elephants spared.
So there you have it. Hopefully that clarifies our car insurance company’s interest in filling seats as easily as possible. See what ride-shareable events are in the cooker and sign up for a seat by visiting the Esurance carpool page.
In honor of the 2011 Click It or Ticket campaign (May 23–June 5), we decided to research the fascinating subject of seat belt history. As researching history on the Internet usually goes, it turned out to be quite the romp through fields of mis- and disinformation, with a measured dose of contradiction thrown in. Here’s what we’re sure is true:
1849 – seat belts make their debut (sorta)
The Internet assures us this is when Volvo offered the first car with built-in seatbelts. If true, it’s interesting that they didn’t introduce the world’s first 3-point front seat belts until 110 years later …
Well, that’s not entirely true. Claghorn’s invention fizzled, but cars with seat belts begin to appear. With little traffic on the roads at the time, these early seat belts undoubtedly helped keep motorists from bouncing around too much during very bumpy rides.
Later, the seat belt emerges in the worlds of flying — where it served to keep pilots in their seats during upside-down maneuvers — and racing, marking the first time racecar drivers managed to be more sane than the rest of the populace.
1930s – lap belts appear
Several U.S. physicians install lap belts (aka, 2-point seat belts) in their own cars and begin urging auto manufacturers to include them in all new cars. The auto manufacturers don’t listen until …
1950 – Nash models get the safety belt
The now-defunct manufacturer Nash includes seat belts in its Statesman and Ambassador models. The general public isn’t all that excited about the development, however, and seat belts continue to be nonstandard for decades to come.
1954 – racecar drivers love seat belt safety
The racecar-driving world continues to outpace safety boards in the Grand Prix du Sanity when the Sports Car Club of America mandates that competing drivers wear lap belts.
Volvo, Ford, and Chrysler each include and actively market seat belts as accessories or options in new models. Numerous Ford ads make their new “Lifeguard” safety features — seat belts included — a central feature. Volvo’s offering anticipates modern seat belts with a diagonal chest strap.
1958 – the 3-point belt saves lives
Volvo design engineer Nils Bohlin patents the first 3-point safety belt. In 2002, Volvo estimated that the invention had already saved over one million lives.
1959 – Volvo leads the way
Volvo makes the 3-point seat belt standard. In Sweden.
1963 – the first standard seat belts
Volvo makes the 3-point belt standard in front seats in the U.S.
1965 – Europe requires front seat belts
Front seat belts become a requirement for cars manufactured in Europe. In the U.S., an estimated 50,000 people die in car wrecks. The U.S. Senate passes a 2-year, $320 million highway beautification bill. Less than one percent of those funds go to highway safety studies.
1966 – the NHTSA is born
The U.S. Congress passes the Highway Safety Act and the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act authorizing the federal government to set and regulate motor vehicle and highway safety standards. The acts also create the National Highway Safety Bureau, now the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Resulting automobile design improvements include:
Energy absorbing steering wheels
Mandated installation of seat belts
1966–1970 – seat belts become standard
With seat belts now present in all American-manufactured cars, seat belt advocates turn to the grim task of convincing Americans to use them. Misconceptions spread like wildfire, convincing some that seat belts will prevent them from escaping their cars underwater or in a fire, and others that it was actually safer to be thrown from a car in an accident. Others assert that drivers compensated for the increased safety by driving more recklessly.
1970 – a hotly contested year
A Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard proposes that all vehicles made after January 1, 1973, include an automatic restraint system, i.e., air bags or automatic belts. The auto industry, knowing that it would have to increase production costs to meet the new standard, balks, leading to a decade of argument and delay.
1981 – seat belt use languishes
Worn down by a decade of argument over the automatic restraint system question, the NHTSA finally withdraws their proposal. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that only 11 percent of those in cars make use of their seat belts.
1983 – new restraint systems regulation
Realizing how much money automatic safety restraint systems would save them, State Farm Insurance Company brings the NHTSA to court over the matter. State Farm wins the case and the NHTSA is ordered to write a new regulation for automatic restraint systems.
1984 – NHTSA proposes seat belt regulations
The NHTSA proposes that automatic restraint systems be required in new vehicles unless mandatory seat belt laws covered two-thirds of population by September 1989. Automakers, safety advocates, and the NHTSA join forces to encourage states’ passage of such laws.
1985 – most states warm to seat belt laws
In startling contrast to the glacial pace of earlier attempts at seat-belt reform, it takes just one year for mandatory seat belt use propositions to be introduced in all states but Idaho and Nevada.
1989 – seat belt use is mandated
By September, 34 states had established seat belt use laws.
1995 – New Hampshire lags
On December 27, Maine finally passes a mandatory seat belt use law, leaving only New Hampshire without such legislation on the books.
1997 – a big year for safety
The CDC reports that seat belt use has increased to 68 percent.
2010 – seat belt use peaks
According to the NHTSA, seat belt use reaches 85 percent, with higher numbers common in the western states.
There’s still room for safety belt improvement
New Hampshire still has no mandatory seat belt use law for adults, and 16 other states have only implemented secondary enforcement laws. In contrast to primary use laws, under which a police officer can stop and ticket a driver simply for not wearing a seat belt, secondary laws only allow for mandatory seat belt use enforcement if a driver has been stopped for some other reason. Studies have shown that primary enforcement is far more effective in improving use and lowering fatalities.
So do your part to prevent crash fatalities by strapping in every time and encouraging your friends, loved ones, coworkers — everyone! — to do the same all year round.
On May 24, Edmunds.com will host a one-day conference in Washington, D.C., to foster discussion and generate a valuable exchange of ideas that will shape the future of automotive safety. Here are some preliminary highlights.
New technology is “the real leap forward for safety”
NHTSA Administrator David Strickland lists some of the new car safety technologies currently under evaluation.
Cars would be safer if they were more dangerous
“I think cars would be safer if they were more dangerous because it would keep you focused. You know what I think the solution’s going to be? It’s not something that most people will like,” advises Don Norman, author of TheDesign of Everyday Things, Emotional Design and Living with Complexity.
Brain development science sheds light on teen driving habits
“[In the teenage brain] a combination of advanced (but not yet totally mature) reasoning and heightened sensation-seeking explains why otherwise intelligent adolescents often do things that are surprisingly foolish (like driving 100 miles an hour just to see what it feels like),” states Dr. Laurence Steinberg, the Distinguished University Professor of Psychology at Temple University and the author of You and Your Adolescent: The Essential Guide for Ages 10 to 25.
What’s more fascinating: our brains or the technology we’re adapting to?